Sudden Conjunctivitis, Lymphopenia, and Rash Combined With Hemodynamic Changes After Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole Use
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
- The authors of this retrospective case series propose an acronym, SCoRCH, for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) severe hypersensitivity syndrome with clinical and mucocutaneous findings distinct from other drug reactions. They reviewed 7 cases in which patients treated with TMP-SMX developed the syndrome within 4 to 11 days in those with no prior TMP-SMX exposure and within 24 hours in those with prior exposure.
- Given the potential life-threatening presentation, clinicians should be aware of SCoRCH — sudden conjunctivitis, generalized erythema, lymphopenia, and hemodynamic instability — in a patient who used TMP-SMX in the preceding 2 weeks.
IMPORTANCE
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) hypersensitivity reaction, ranging from circulatory shock to aseptic meningitis and respiratory failure, is a potentially life-threatening condition with dermatologic relevance.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the mucocutaneous findings and clinical features of TMP-SMX hypersensitivity reaction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This was a retrospective case series study of 7 patients who developed a characteristic rash, hemodynamic changes, and end-organ dysfunction after treatment with TMP-SMX at a large university hospital system during January 2013 to March 2022.
EXPOSURES
Treatment with TMP-SMX within 2 weeks of the reaction.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES
Descriptions of the condition, including the demographic information of the affected population, the reaction timeline, and mucocutaneous and clinical features.
RESULTS
The cohort comprised 7 patients (median [range] age, 20 [15-66] years; 4 female and 3 male). The most common mucocutaneous findings were generalized sunburn-like erythema without scale, conjunctivitis, and mild facial and acral edema. Three patients had previous exposure to TMP-SMX and developed symptoms in 1 day or less, while those without prior exposure presented from 4 to 11 days after drug initiation. Among the 7 patients, 6 had fever, 7 had hypotension, and 7 had tachycardia. All patients had lymphopenia and evidence of end-organ dysfunction with either kidney or liver involvement. Median (range) time to resolution was 72 (48-96) hours.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This retrospective case series indicates that SCoRCH (sudden conjunctivitis, lymphopenia, and rash combined with hemodynamic changes) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with acute generalized sunburn-like erythema, conjunctivitis, systemic symptoms, and hemodynamic changes in the setting of recent TMP-SMX use.
Sudden Conjunctivitis, Lymphopenia, and Rash Combined With Hemodynamic Changes (SCoRCH) After Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Use: A Case Series Study of a Hypersensitivity Reaction
JAMA Dermatol 2022 Nov 09;[EPub Ahead of Print], M O'Brian, EK Rose, MM Mauskar, AR DominguezSkin Care Physicians of Costa Rica
Clinica Victoria en San Pedro: 4000-1054
Momentum Escazu: 2101-9574
Please excuse the shortness of this message, as it has been sent from
a mobile device.
This is a large population-based study of non-keratinocyte skin cancers (NKSC) in people living with HIV infection (PLWH) during the antiretroviral therapy era. It is important to remember that PLWH face the complete spectrum of dermatologic conditions, including cutaneous malignancies. And, while entities such as Kaposi sarcoma and other AIDS-defining conditions may be perceived as most classically associated with HIV infection, PLWH may present with any type of skin cancer. That written, this study found that, for most NKSCs, risk was not elevated for PLWH compared with the general population, suggesting that PLWH may not require routine skin cancer screening in the absence of other meaningful risk factors.
Importantly, comments made in this paper regarding screening are made in the context of the cancers specifically investigated in the study, namely NKSCs. The jury is still out regarding risk of keratinocyte skin cancer in PLWH. Prior studies, including meta-analyses, have suggested that HIV infection may be independently associated with a higher incidence of both keratinocyte carcinoma and melanoma, although these studies come with limitations.1-4 A more recent systematic review included four studies, the majority of which did not show any such associations in patients older than 50 years compared with age-matched, HIV-uninfected persons.5 However, it was found that HIV infection might be associated with higher risks of subsequent squamous cell carcinoma in PLWH who already had a history of keratinocyte carcinoma.
Of course, the USPSTF currently does not recommend routine skin cancer screening, and existing care guidelines for PLWH have also yet to offer specific recommendations on skin cancer screening and risk reduction. That written, it is important that a personalized, patient-centered approach be utilized in the care of PWLH given the intersection of multiple factors germane to skin cancer outcomes, including HIV infection itself, degree of immunosuppression, medications, aging, and behavioral risk factors, just to name a few. Regarding the latter, disproportionately high rates of some skin cancers and indoor tanning have been identified in some populations of gay and bisexual men,6 and, given the higher risk of HIV infection in these populations, these intersections further amplify the need for focused research into these risks and how they can be mitigated in a manner that does not unduly conflate distinct populations and risk factors.
Intuitively, PLWH may be at a higher risk for tumors caused by oncogenic viruses, including Merkel cell carcinoma, associated with the Merkel cell polyomavirus, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. Conceptually, this mirrors observations in other organ systems in PLWH, specifically the rising incidence of anal dysplasia and anal cancer (caused by the human papillomavirus). In the case of anal cancer, the ongoing increase in incidence despite antiretroviral therapy may be related to the qualitative impacts of HIV infection on the immune system, immunologic dysregulation, and/or decreased efficiency of oncogenic viral surveillance. Further, antiretroviral therapy has allowed for PLWH to live longer and healthier lives, but this also arguably allows for greater opportunities for oncogenic viral replication and transformation.
Ultimately, we must be aware that neither all people within a group nor all skin cancers are homogeneous. PLWH encompass innumerable characteristics from all walks of life, representing all gender identities, sexual orientations, races/ethnicities, countries of origin, and ages. As such, care must be individualized and patient-centered to understand the unique risk factors of the patient in front of you and to most effectively and humbly meet them where they are.
References