Cambio en analisis de estudios de inmunoterapias en cancer
Long-Term Survival Rates for Immunotherapies Could Be Misinterpreted
The findings suggest that some of the published survival data for these immunotherapies should be re-analysed for potential misinterpretation.
Yu Shyr, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and colleagues have proposed an adjustment to convert the inappropriate Cox proportional-hazards model to the appropriate cure model. The adjustment utilizes the Cox-TEL (Cox PH-Taylor expansion for long-term survival data) method.
"The Cox proportional-hazards model has become ingrained as the preferred choice for survival analysis in clinical trials for many reasons, including its robustness; however, researchers should not blindly use this in immunotherapy trials," said Dr. Shyr. "Because the model's proportional hazards assumption is clearly violated in some immunotherapy trials, the results and conclusions based on this model are inaccurate and misleading."
"We wanted to create an approach that would not only correct the hazard ratio of the Cox proportional-hazards model, but also be interpretable and practical for both clinicians and statisticians," he said. "We believe Cox-TEL will be used widely to avoid misinterpretation of clinical trials with long-term survival."
The team of researchers initiated their work because of the common observance of long tails and crossovers in survival curves with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These observances violate the proportional hazards assumption in the widely-used Cox proportional-hazards model.
Dr. Shyr and colleagues looked at simulated data and real-world data from published immune checkpoint inhibitor trials. In comparing the Cox proportional-hazards model to the Cox-TEL adjustment method, they determined that the Cox-TEL adjustment method was more accurate in assessing long-term survival.
"Comprehensive simulations show the strength of the proposed method in terms of power, bias, and type I error rate," the authors wrote. "The magnitude of potential difference between reported and adjusted HRs using real-world immune checkpoint inhibitor trial results is demonstrated. For example, in the CheckMate 067 trial (nivolumab/ipilimumab combination therapy vs ipilimumab), the Cox HR was 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.67), and the Cox-TEL HR was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.11)."
"The findings of this study suggest the need to revisit published immune checkpoint inhibitor survival data analysis to address potential misinterpretation," the authors concluded. "The Cox-TEL method not only is designed for this purpose, but also is user friendly and easy to implement using published clinical trial data and a freely available R software package.
Reference: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/article-abstract/2778199
SOURCE: Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Skin Care Physicians of Costa Rica
Clinica Victoria en San Pedro: 4000-1054
Momentum Escazu: 2101-9574
Please excuse the shortness of this message, as it has been sent from
a mobile device.
Chronic leg ulcers are a common clinical problem in the dermatologist's office. Leg ulcerations can be due to numerous underlying etiologies but can also be complicated by contact allergy, which can delay wound healing. Allergic contact dermatitis can be increased in this setting due to the impaired epidermal barrier and the multitude of products and dressings applied to the wounds.
This study from Norway evaluated contact allergy in patients with chronic leg ulcers due to venous stasis that were present for 6 weeks or more. Patch testing was performed with the Leg Ulcer Series and the European Baseline Series (EBS). The patients removed the patches themselves after 48 hours and presented to clinic for one reading conducted at day 3. The most frequent allergens in the leg ulcer series were to wood tar mix, benzalkonium chloride, and fusidic acid, as well as INTRASITE Gel and topical steroids. The most common allergens in the EBS were Myroxylon pereirae, fragrance mix, colophonium, and thiuram mix. In this study, 40% of patients with a positive patch test had one reaction, 33% had two reactions, 10% had three reactions, and 17% had four or more reactions, reminding us that multiple allergens can be common in this scenario due to the reality that numerous potential allergens are applied to the wound.
The study is limited by the solitary reading at day 3 and is also limited in part by the geographic differences in products and wound dressing practices that may not translate to similar allergens being generalizable to other regions or countries. However, the study does highlight the need for clinicians to consider contact allergy in the setting of chronic leg ulcerations.
Dermatologists should consider contact allergy in the setting of any chronic wounds when routine wound care does not result in typical healing, there is significant surrounding dermatitis, significant pruritus, or if a wound was progressing and then halts or worsens. The potential allergens include all topical preparations, both-over-the counter and prescription, as well as the dressings particular to the patient and the clinic where he/she is being treated.