Cuidado con lo que se lee y si es publicado no necesariamente es totalmente solido: Toxic Ingredients in Personal Care Products: A Dermatological Perspective
Lectura critica!
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
- This review explores data regarding environmental pollutants, including bisphenols, phthalates, parabens, poly-fluoroalkyl substances, p-phenylenediamine, and formaldehyde, found in personal care products. The article delves into the toxicology and pathophysiologic mechanisms of these compounds as well as the potential dermatological manifestations.
- This review examines the various environmental pollutants in personal care products, offering medical professionals insight into their potential effects on dermatological health.
Less is more
Personal care products constitute a multibillion-dollar industry that is expected to grow significantly in the ensuing years. Propagated by celebrities and social media influencers, trends in personal care products continue to evolve. One thing that has stayed constant is the dizzying array of unreadable and unpronounceable ingredients that constitute a product. Most ingredients are there for a reason — whether it is a preservative that prevents the harmful growth of bacteria or an emulsifier that prevents the separation of oils in the sunscreen sitting in your cabinet — some may cause more harm than good. Social media and environmental activist groups have promoted "clean" beauty to avoid these potentially harmful ingredients. However, is the evidence truly robust enough to discount these potentially dangerous ingredients?
Lin et al published a comprehensive review of potentially "problematic" ingredients in personal care products, including bisphenols, phthalates, parabens, per-fluoroalkyl and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, p-phenylenediamine, and formaldehyde, identified by the Environmental Working Group. Many of these ingredients, such as bisphenols and phthalates, are labeled as potential endocrine disruptors. Some ingredients, including bisphenols, parabens, and phthalates, have been linked to the development of cancers, while others are listed as potential contact allergens, such as parabens, formaldehyde, and p-phenylenediamine.
Although the article cites numerous sources for its claims (137 sources!), this is a perfect example of an instance where just because the article is published in a journal, does not mean it is clinically relevant. Most studies on endocrine disruption have been conducted in animal models or ex-vivo cells and not at physiologic doses of the chemical. Similar to the aluminum and breast cancer scare, there are no high-quality studies that support this relationship. While the jury is still out for these chemicals, I would suggest reading this review with a critical lens. The American Contact Dermatitis Society named parabens as the non-allergen of the year to dispel the myth that parabens are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis and to support its use in personal care products in lieu of potentially more sensitizing allergens such as methylisothiazolinone. The American Cancer Society states that there is no good evidence to suggest that aluminum or parabens increase the risk of breast cancer, citing poor-quality studies.
At the end of the day, less is probably more. Patients often ask me about my skin care routine, and I say "soap and water" because I don't need more than that. Is there evidence that an eight-step nighttime routine is better than my 8-second one? The jury is out for that.
Skin Care Physicians of Costa Rica
Clinica Victoria en San Pedro: 4000-1054
Momentum Escazu: 2101-9574
Please excuse the shortness of this message, as it has been sent from
a mobile device.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home