Abstract
IMPORTANCE
Photoaggravated atopic dermatitis (PAD) is estimated to affect 1.4% to 16% of patients with AD but remains poorly characterized with limited published data.
OBJECTIVE
To provide detailed clinical and photobiological characterization of PAD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This case series study used cross-sectional data collected from 120 consecutive patients diagnosed with PAD from January 2015 to October 2019 at a tertiary center referral unit for photobiology.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Routinely collected standardized clinical and photobiological data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and regression analysis explored associations between demographic and clinical data.
RESULTS
Of 869 patients who underwent photoinvestigation, 120 (14%) were diagnosed with PAD (69 female [58%]; median age, 45 [IQR, 31-61] years; range, 5-83 years; skin phototypes [SPTs] I-VI). Of these patients, 104 (87%) were adults. All patients had a history of AD, and most (62 of 104 [60%]) presented with sunlight-provoked or photodistributed eczema; median age at photosensitivity onset was 37 years (range, 1-72 years). Past-year Dermatology Life Quality Index score was greater than 10 for 80 of 103 adults (78%), and 82 of 119 (69%) had vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) level insufficiency or deficiency (<20 ng/mL; to convert ng/mL to nmol/L, multiply by 2.496). Broadband UV radiation provocation test results were positive for 112 patients (93%). In 28 patients (23%) with abnormal monochromator phototest findings, sensitivity occurred to UV-A, UV-B, and/or visible light, and UV-A of 350 ± 10 nm was the most prevalent wavelength. Photopatch test reactions were positive for 18 patients (15%). Patients with SPTs V to VI (31 [26%]) vs SPTs I to IV (89 [74%]) were younger at photosensitivity onset (median age, 24 years [IQR, 15-37 years] vs 40 years [IQR, 25-55 years]; P = .003), were more likely to be female (23 [74%] vs 46 [52%]; P = .03), and had a lower vitamin D status and a higher frequency of abnormal monochromator phototest findings.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this case series study, PAD affected patients with different ages and SPTs and was associated with substantially impaired quality of life. The findings suggest that confirming PAD through phototesting may provide better personalized care for patients through identification of provoking wavelengths, relevant photocontact allergies, and appropriate photoprotection advice.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
This case series characterizes the clinical traits of patients with photoaggravated atopic dermatitis (PAD). A total of 869 patients underwent photoinvestigation, with 120 patients (14%) ultimately being diagnosed with PAD. The patients tended to report seasonal worsening of eczema, photodistributed exacerbations, or sunlight-provoked rash.
- Understanding the signs and symptoms of PAD can help clinicians diagnose and treat patients with this rare subtype of atopic dermatitis.
JAMA Dermatology
Clinicophotobiological Characterization of Photoaggravated Atopic Dermatitis
Sent from my iPhone
Benjamin Hidalgo-Matlock
Skin Care Physicians of Costa Rica
Clinica Victoria en San Pedro: 4000-1054
Momentum Escazu: 2101-9574
Please excuse the shortness of this message, as it has been sent from
a mobile device.
A group from predominantly the University of Amsterdam undertook a MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed database search through May 2022 of the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of lentigo maligna (melanoma; LM/LMM). Additionally, they investigated clinicians who employed handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) pre-op to determine LM/LMM margination. The outcomes they evaluated were local recurrences and survival. A total of 41 studies were included involving 5059 LM and 1271 LMM; surgical techniques included wide local excision (WLE) and staged excision and Mohs' micrographic surgery (MSS). Only 6 studies included pre-op RCM to determine lateral margins of the LM/LMM.
They found the following:
The authors concluded that there was a clear reduction in local recurrences using MMS over WLE and that the pre-op use of handheld RCM showed a trend in the reduction of incomplete resections and local recurrences even when used with WLE.
MMS, especially with the use of immunohistochemistry, is now considered the best practice for LM/LMM when available as it has been demonstrated to reduce recurrences. Better presurgical planning with the pre-op use of handheld RCM to evaluate the lateral extension of the neoplasm has also been documented to reduce the number of stages needed during the Mohs procedure, time to closure, and recurrences. The authors of this study, however, did not discuss what protocol or how the handheld RCM was employed to determine the melanoma lateral margins. Unfortunately, the authors did not make note of the fact that many institutions did not have RCM available, the use of RCM for lateral margin determination could be very time-consuming, and the interpretation of the images required significant training. As an admitted confocal enthusiast, I am hopeful that the availability of the technology and training needed for interpretation will be addressed and corrected in the next few years as science continues to demonstrate how helpful RCM can be in the care of our patients.
I am optimistic that articles like this one will stimulate more Mohs surgeons to obtain a confocal and learn how to read RCM stacks and mosaics. In my opinion, the use of RCM will replace many biopsies, avoiding unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions and allowing patients to go directly to definitive surgery and only undergo one procedure when appropriate. In addition, RCM will help our surgeons better establish the lateral margins of tumors prior to surgery, which will enhance the likelihood of one excision and/or avoid the need for more than one or two Mohs stages. This prediction would result in less surgery for patients (with reduced morbidity) and significant savings to the healthcare system.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE